Drop restrictions on local pharmacists to protect local and state economies
Tuesday, May 4, 2004
The Hillsdale Daily News
By Karri Doty
Local pharmacists are vital members of our business community – trusted, involved, dependable and available when we need them. Consumers place great value on the personal services they receive – without charge – from these conveniently located healthcare providers.
Faceless, out-of-state mail-order pharmacies, by contrast, have drawn consumer complaints, federal lawsuits and other government action in state after state. Issues range from questionable pricing, reliability and safety to outright fraud and paying massive kickbacks.
Concerns like these motivated Michigan legislators to introduce a five-bill Consumer Prescription Protection Act now being reviewed in Lansing. Comprised of House Bills 4987, 5435, 5436, 5437 and 5438, it would assure that health plans allow an identical-cost choice of whether to fill long-term prescriptions locally or by mail.
The current trend toward mail order mandates isn’t good for anyone except the warehouse facilities and their owners – the same Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) that won’t let community stores provide 90-day prescriptions for chronic conditions at identical prices and terms as the mail providers. It’s not that local drugstores cannot effectively compete with mail-order fulfillment houses – they aren’t allowed to.
Critics of the Consumer Prescription Protection Act contend that it will raise costs for employers, perhaps to the point of making prescription drug coverage unaffordable by many businesses. Frankly, I don’t buy that. In my view, this legislation significantly increases competition, and I have yet to see a situation where competition raises prices.
The trend to force employees to use mail order pharmacies is growing. In a recent survey of more than 600 employers that provide benefits to over 15 million workers, 21 percent said they have a mandatory-mail-order program in place or are adopting one this year. An additional 48 percent are considering a mandatory-mail plan, according to the survey by Hewitt Associates, a human-resources consulting firm.
I find those numbers both shocking and unfortunate. Almost 70 percent of employers either use or are considering using a procedure that robs consumers of choice, damages local and regional economies and degrades quality healthcare. Here in Michigan, our will lose $2 billion in prescription spending this year. Two billion dollars that could and should be spent here in Michigan! I find that unacceptable.
Local druggists are put at a competitive disadvantage by the pharmacy benefit managers that design and administer prescription benefit programs for employers and insurers. One PBM – Medco Health – now manages pharmacy benefits for the whole auto industry: its mail order pharmacy fills all mail-in prescriptions for UAW members and retirees. Who among us wouldn’t love to have a sweet deal like that!
Unless PBMs are prohibited from discriminating against retail pharmacies, consumers could see hundreds of Michigan community pharmacies being forced to close, weakening the state through lost jobs, tax revenues and local purchases of services and goods.
Patients strongly prefer shopping at their community pharmacy.
Michigan’s 2,000 pharmacies are vital to the state’s economic health. For many people, especially senior citizens and the disabled, they are the essential links to quality healthcare.
To continue their important role, our state’s pharmacies don’t need tax breaks or rebates or special exemptions. They simply need to have their hands untied so that they can compete toe-to-toe with the giant out-of-state mail-order facilities.
I urge everyone who reads this to take a few minutes to write their state representative and state senator and urge them to support the Consumer Prescription Protection Act. It’s good healthcare and good business.
-
Karri Doty is president of the Hillsdale County Chamber of Commerce.

Welcome | Latest News | Your Legislator | Mail Order | Questions
Contact Us | Petition | Links


Coalition for Quality Healthcare

"Upholding high standards of personal service, assuring full access to
consumer options and preserving the traditional contributions of local
pharmacies to the state's economy"

© Copyright 2004 Coalition for Quality Healthcare. All rights reserved.
 
Medco's Clash With Clarity
1 / 5 / 2006
Why You Should Support HB 5254!
11 / 1 / 2005
Generic Drugs By Mail Can Be A Raw Deal
2 / 15 / 2005
UAW plan pinches local pharmacies
2 / 8 / 2005
U.S. Maintains Medco Offered Insurer a Kickback
12 / 3 / 2004
Fill This!
12 / 3 / 2004
Medco May Face Turbulence
11 / 26 / 2004
Illinois ends Caremark contract
11 / 19 / 2004
Study: Shipping through mail can degrade medicine
10 / 27 / 2004
States Want Say on Drugs
8 / 22 / 2004
Express Scripts accused of defrauding state and consumers out of millions of dollars
8 / 4 / 2004
Competitive Concerns and Price Transparency in the PBM Market
7 / 27 / 2004
Protect the Upper Peninsula’s economy by ending restrictions on local pharmacists
5 / 5 / 2004
Drop restrictions on local pharmacists to protect local and state economies
5 / 4 / 2004
Competition will trim Michigan drug costs
4 / 28 / 2004
Pharmacies seek fair competition
4 / 27 / 2004
There Oughta Be a Law
4 / 26 / 2004
Medco to Pay $29M to Settle Accusations
4 / 26 / 2004
House panel eyes Rx break for pharmacies
4 / 21 / 2004
Prescription bills benefit consumers
4 / 2 / 2004
Pharmacists want to match mail-order prices
3 / 30 / 2004
No Cost Increases With CPPA
3 / 29 / 2004
Medicine by mail costly to jobs
3 / 16 / 2004
Mailing drugs may cost jobs
3 / 16 / 2004
Lost Jobs & Tax Revenue, Higher Unemployment Predicted by Study
3 / 16 / 2004
Mail-Order Prescription Mandates To Cost State 3,000 Jobs, $117 Million in Wages
3 / 16 / 2004
Forcing Employees to Buy Drugs Through the Mail.
2 / 19 / 2004
Medco Loses Deal To Supply Drugs To U.S. Employees
2 / 19 / 2004
New Legislation Helps Pharmacies Compete with Mail-Order
1 / 23 / 2004
New Laws Would Level Playing Field for Michigan Pharmacies
1 / 23 / 2004
Beloved Pharmacist Says Goodbye
1 / 20 / 2004
The drugs are in the mail and local druggists pay for it
1 / 20 / 2004
Prescription Coverage Editorial
1 / 4 / 2004
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Printer Friendly